DESCRIPTION

Today, a prep phase against endpoint protection (EPP) and endpoint detection and response (EDR) products is part of every red team engagement, and preparing to create evasive malware that bypasses the targeted EDR to gain initial access can often be very time consuming. In general, when preparing malware such as a shellcode loader or similar, we want to be as sure as possible that our malware will be able to bypass the targeted EDR. The simplest approach is to start building malware and use trial and error to see if your malware is able to evade the EDR (evasion defined as not prevented and not detected) or if the malware is caught by the EDR. In order to build not only better, but more effective malware, it really helps to go beyond trial and error testing and start investing time and energy in reversing and debugging EDRs and trying to better understand the logic of the detection mechanisms they implement.
 
To build more evasive or effective malware, you need to know your enemy, in this case the EDR. By now most community members are aware that modern EDRs use things like the Antimalware Scan Interface (AMSI) to detect malicious powershell activity, or use user mode hooking to detect potentially malicious behaviour in the context of Windows APIs, or use kernel drivers to register various types of kernel callback routines such as ProcessNotifiyRoutine to detect when a new process is created, and so on. However, in addition to these well-known mechanisms, some EDRs use more sophisticated and unconventional mechanisms that have been used by the game hacking community for many years. By looking at these EDRs more closely, by trying to reverse engineer and debug them, some of these detections can be interpreted as some tricky traps for malware influenced by the game hacking community. In my talk "EDR Analysis: An introduction to reversing sophisticated detection," I will provide insights into how to debug, reverse, and understand these EDR detection mechanisms in detail, as well as how to evade them.



WHY THE COMMITTEE CHOSE THIS TALK

A lot of companys rely mainly on their EDR system for protection. EDR has become the first line of defense for many. But as with all products it is not a golden bullet to solve all problems. We are excited to learn about the limitations in practice.

SPEAKER

Daniel Feichter